Zebrafish Knock-in Tagging Services
Tag your favorite gene at the native locus in your zebrafish line via CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology. Choose from a large selection of fluorescent proteins and epitope tags.
- Fluorescent tagging is typically used to aid in visualization of spatiotemporal dynamics of a given gene's protein product in live (and sometimes fixed) animals.
- Epitope tagging is most often utilized to facilitate biochemical studies, in particular for studies of protein-protein interactions which require the presence of a readily recognizable epitope or sequence feature for chemical modification or isolation.
Knock-in Tagging Techniques:
- Knocking in a fluorescent tag at the native locus. Observe when and where your gene of interest is expressed using fluorescence. A genetically encoded fluorescent marker (GFP, mCherry, etc.) can be inserted in-frame for tagging of either the N- or C-terminus of your protein.
- Knocking in a protein tag. Genetically encoded tags (FLAG tag, HA-tag, poly(His) tag, etc.) can be inserted in-frame for tagging of either the N- or C-terminus of your protein. The protein can then be observed by Western blots, immunofluorescence, and immunoprecipitation using commercially available common antibodies.
Fluorescent Tagging vs. Epitope Tagging in Zebrafish
| Fluorescent Tagging | Epitope Tagging | |
| Example of tags | ||
| Applications | in fixed tissue samples |
|
| Pros | Can aid in visualization of spatiotemporal dynamics of a given gene's protein product in live (and sometimes fixed) animals. | Can facilitate visualization or isolation of protein expression with reduced chance of disrupting endogenous expression levels or protein trafficking dynamics due to relatively small size. Can also facilitate visualization or biochemical modification of proteins in fixed tissue with comparatively robust and cheap commercially available antibodies. |
| Cons | Can interfere with gene function due to the relatively large size of fluorophores used. | Not sufficiently validated. Lack of publications. |
(Left): SelN-BFPSTOP with BFP followed by a STOP codon inserted into the N-terminus of Selenon (SelN). (Center and Right): Ryr1a-mCherry line where the endogenous Ryr1a was tagged with mCherry at the N-terminus. Image courtesy of Melissa A. Wright, MD/PhD, Assistant Professor of Pediatric Neurology at University of Colorado.
Knock-in Tagging Service Options (price reflects academic pricing)
| Standard Injection Mix | Standard Injection Mix + Screening Primers | Validated sgRNA Injection Mix | Complete Validated Injection Mix | Verified Clutch* (F0 injected Embryos) | Full Build** (Sequence verified heterozygous line) | |
| KI Tag Design |  | | | | | |
| Injection Mix Assembly | | | | | | |
| Locus Evaluation & Screening Reagents | | | | | |
|
| InVivo sgRNA Testing | | | | |
||
| InVivo Editing Assessment | | | |
|||
| Expertly Injected Embryos | | |
||||
| Germline Transmission Screening & Line Propagation | |
|||||
| Pricing | $2,995 | $4,595 | $5,995 | $7,995 | $11,395 | $28,995 |
| Timeline | 4 - 6 weeks | 6 - 8 weeks | 8-10 weeks | 10 - 12 weeks | 4- 8 months | 9 - 12 months |
| More Details | More Details | More Details | More Details | More Details | More Details |
* This service is only available to clients in the United States.
** Full Build includes screening 100 adults; standard husbandry charge applies.
Injection Mix and sgRNA Validation Details
Standard Injection Mix
Choose this option if you want us to pick your sgRNA site, have already tested your sgRNA in vivo, or want to make a CRISPR knockout. We send a custom designed injection mix and you develop your own preferred detection/screening protocol.
What’s Included?
- Consultation with a genetic engineer to develop the genome editing strategy
- In silico design of all reagents including the sgRNA site and donor homology template
- Sequence files for the donor homology construct and edited locus
- 4 vials of 10uL lyophilized sgRNAs duplexed with the Cas9 protein
- Injection dyes for early visualization of injection success
- Detailed Instructions on mix reconstitution and injection protocols.
Standard Injection Mix + Screening Primers
Choose this option if you want to inject and screen for your edit by PCR without having to worry about designing your own screening primers. This option includes our standard mix plus ready-to-go screening primers.
What’s Included?
- Our Standard Injection Mix PLUS:
- Prescreened Allele Specific PCR primers to detect your edit in zebrafish tissue.
Validated sgRNA Injection Mix
Choose this option if you want us to guarantee your injection mix is designed around a high efficiency sgRNA site using our rigorous in-house testing process.
What’s Included?
- Our Standard Injection Mix PLUS:
- Selection and testing of two sgRNAs for in vivo evaluation of cutting efficiency
- Donor homology designed around a demonstrated high efficiency sgRNA site
- In vivo screening for potential polymorphisms in your target locus
Complete Validated Injection Mix
Choose this option if you want a CRISPR knockin with completely validated reagents to use in your lab and to find your gene edited line. This is the best Custom Injection Mix option for the novice zebrafish line builder.
What’s Included?
- OUR VALIDATED sgRNA INJECTION MIX PLUS:
- Full in vivo evaluation of somatic editing efficiency.
- Confirmation of integration capacity of your edit into the zebrafish genome
Verified Clutch (F0 injected Embryos)
Choose this option if you want a CRISPR knockin with completely validated reagents to use in your lab and to find your gene edited line. This is a good option for the researcher who wants to outsource part of the workload in the development of a new line.
What’s Included?
- Our Complete Validated Injection Mix PLUS:
- Expertly injected embryos for direct submission to you nursery
- Fully validated PCR primers and protocols for edit detection assay in your own lab.
Full Build (Sequence verified heterozygous line)
Choose this option if you want us to deliver a stable sequence validated CRISPR knockin line.
What’s Included?
- Veried Clutch (F0 injected Embryos) Plus:
- Growth of F0 injected embryos in our nursery
- Rigous screening of F0 injected adults for germline transmission of your edit
- Sequence conformation and propagation of F1 heterozygous animals
Injection Mix Service Component Descriptions
Injection Mix
Injection Mix
We create a mix using quality custom reagents from our validated suppliers. The sgRNAs are duplexed with the Cas9 protein.
The mix is created using concentrations of Cas9, sgRNA and donor homology that work well in our genome editing pipeline. The mix is provided as a stable dehydrated reagent.
Four injection mixes are provided that reconstitute to 5ul of mix each.
- Custom reagents from validated suppliers
- Four 10uL lyophilized injection mixes with instructions on reconstitution
- Rhodamine dye for early visualization of injection success
Screening Reagents
Screening Reagents
You can miss your edit if you don’t have a good assay to detect it.
We will design and test a robust assay to detect your edit, which is critical when you begin germline screening.
We will also provide PCR primers and protocols for an edit detection assay.
- PCR primers designed and tested to identify the target edit
- PCR protocol to identify animals that contain your edit
sgRNA Testing
sgRNA Testing
Ensure that you have the quality reagents you need for a successful genome edit. The efficiency of the sgRNA guided cutting can vary widely and is directly tied to the achievement of a successful genome edit.
Algorithms and experience help us choose the best candidate sgRNAs for your project, but the guided cutting efficiency of an sgRNA can be impacted by genome organization, for example, chromatin accessibility. The best way to determine the effectiveness of an sgRNA in a Zebrafish genome is to test it in vivo in the injected embryos.
We test your sgRNAs for their ability to guide Cas9 cutting. Our process also identifies SNPs and polymorphoisms in your locus that may impact homology directed repair. Embryos are injected with two different sgRNA/Cas9 duplexes and we determine the cutting efficiency for each sgRNA. If both sgRNAs fail to guide successful cutting, a third sgRNA is injected and tested.
Additional sgRNA testing can also be added with consultation.
- Up to 3 sgRNAs tested for CRISPR cutting efficiency in zebrafish embryos
- Selection against sgRNAs that have toxic effects
- Identification of an sgRNA that is successful for guiding CRISPR cutting
In Vivo Editing Efficiency Screening
In Vivo Editing Efficiency Screening
Have total peace of mind by having us test your injection mix in our facility.
Our skilled injectionists will inject embryos with your mix and determine the somatic integration efficiency by PCR.
We will confirm the precise edit by sequencing to ensure that your edit is occurring correctly with no erroneous insertions.
- Test injection of mix into embryos
- Integration efficiency in injected embryos
- Sequencing to confirm precise edit
Expertly Injected Embryos
Expertly Injected Embryos
Our team precisely injects the sg(s) targeting the locus or region of interest, Cas9 protein and the donor homology template to generate F0 embryos.
Germline Transmission Screening & Line Propagation
Germline Transmission Screening & Line Propagation
F0 embryos are reared to adulthood and then screened for germline transmission using a combination of screening techniques to identify germline founders. Identified adults are propagated to ensure a sufficient number of animals to ship to your facility.
Key References
A thorough review of current methods around point mutation knock-ins in zebrafish using CRISPR/Cas9, including the detailed description of the screening workflow for identifying the rare precise editing events generated with current knock-in approaches.
An excellent overview of knock-ins in zebrafish. The article provides one of the most comprehensive side-by-side comparisons of donor template designs and knock-in strategies available for zebrafish at the time. A detailed discussion of the different repair pathways, template designs, and different reagent choices, as well as their limitations and paths forward for improving knock-in editing efficiencies in the future is very informative
Boel et al. delve into the dizzying realm of ssODN-mediated knock-in repair with a comprehensive assessment of the impacts of different repair templates and design strategies on editing outcomes. Potential mechanisms of repair that lead to complex mutation patterns obtained with ssODN templates, as well as potential avenues for improvement on these methods are also discussed.
READY TO GET STARTED?
Ready to connect with us to learn more about working with our company or our technology?